The sixth part of The Christian-Quaker distinguished from the apostate & innovator : being a just defence against the reproach of scandalous tongues and pens : and a proper looking-glass for a meeting in London, termed the second-days meeting, who are reputed the approvers of three books, or papers against a treatise entituled, the Christian-quaker, &c. in five parts given forth by W.R. on behalf of himself and other friends in truth concerned
(Microfilm)

Book Cover
Average Rating

Description

Loading Description...

Also in this Series

Checking series information...

Copies

LocationCall NumberStatus
Cleveland Public Library - Main Library - Microform CenterPR161 .E32X STC2On Shelf

More Like This

Loading more titles like this title...

More Details

Format
Microfilm
Physical Desc
24 pages
Language
English

Notes

General Note
Signed at end: William Rogers.
General Note
Reproduction of original in the Union Theological Seminary Library, New York.
Citation/References
Wing,R1863
Reproduction
Microfilm.,Ann Arbor, Mich. :,University Microfilms International,,1980.,1 microfilm reel ; 35 mm.,(Early English books, 1641-1700 : 1045:22).

Syndetics Unbound

Citations

APA Citation, 7th Edition (style guide)

Rogers, W. (1681). The sixth part of The Christian-Quaker distinguished from the apostate & innovator: being a just defence against the reproach of scandalous tongues and pens : and a proper looking-glass for a meeting in London, termed the second-days meeting, who are reputed the approvers of three books, or papers against a treatise entituled, the Christian-quaker, &c. in five parts given forth by W.R. on behalf of himself and other friends in truth concerned . Printed for W.R. ....

Chicago / Turabian - Author Date Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)

Rogers, William, -approximately 1709. 1681. The Sixth Part of The Christian-Quaker Distinguished From the Apostate & Innovator: Being a Just Defence against the Reproach of Scandalous Tongues and Pens : And a Proper Looking-glass for a Meeting in London, Termed the Second-days Meeting, Who Are Reputed the Approvers of Three Books, or Papers against a Treatise Entituled, the Christian-quaker, &c. in Five Parts Given Forth By W.R. On Behalf of Himself and Other Friends in Truth Concerned. London: Printed for W.R. ...

Chicago / Turabian - Humanities (Notes and Bibliography) Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)

Rogers, William, -approximately 1709. The Sixth Part of The Christian-Quaker Distinguished From the Apostate & Innovator: Being a Just Defence against the Reproach of Scandalous Tongues and Pens : And a Proper Looking-glass for a Meeting in London, Termed the Second-days Meeting, Who Are Reputed the Approvers of Three Books, or Papers against a Treatise Entituled, the Christian-quaker, &c. in Five Parts Given Forth By W.R. On Behalf of Himself and Other Friends in Truth Concerned London: Printed for W.R. .., 1681.

Harvard Citation (style guide)

Rogers, W. (1681). The sixth part of the christian-quaker distinguished from the apostate & innovator: being a just defence against the reproach of scandalous tongues and pens : and a proper looking-glass for a meeting in london, termed the second-days meeting, who are reputed the approvers of three books, or papers against a treatise entituled, the christian-quaker, &c. in five parts given forth by W.R. on behalf of himself and other friends in truth concerned. London: Printed for W.R. ...

MLA Citation, 9th Edition (style guide)

Rogers, William. The Sixth Part of The Christian-Quaker Distinguished From the Apostate & Innovator: Being a Just Defence against the Reproach of Scandalous Tongues and Pens : And a Proper Looking-glass for a Meeting in London, Termed the Second-days Meeting, Who Are Reputed the Approvers of Three Books, or Papers against a Treatise Entituled, the Christian-quaker, &c. in Five Parts Given Forth By W.R. On Behalf of Himself and Other Friends in Truth Concerned Printed for W.R. ..., 1681.

Note! Citations contain only title, author, edition, publisher, and year published. Citations should be used as a guideline and should be double checked for accuracy. Citation formats are based on standards as of August 2021.

Staff View

Loading Staff View.